<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlie Sheen is an Fuxtard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everythingswank.com/2006/03/charlie-sheen-is-an-fuxtard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everythingswank.com/2006/03/charlie-sheen-is-an-fuxtard/</link>
	<description>We'll Tell You What Rocks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drw</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingswank.com/2006/03/charlie-sheen-is-an-fuxtard/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Drw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 04:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingswank.com/?p=3#comment-5</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need to look any further than the 2004 election to realize that people are stupid.  Since Fox News is still in business, I know there have got to be people who still think that Saddam Huessien is responsible for 9/11.  

Great work Fox News fans and Bible belters, Bush has really defended marriage since his relection.  What is the next issue to protect America from, Flag Burning?  In the meantime, good luck finding any actual accomplishments (or even an agenda) that exsist in reality aka outside of Karl Rove&#039;s bunghole.

Charlie Sheen is a moron; fantastic observation everythingswank!  Is your effort to find pseudo-news really just an effort to avoid writing about what a fucking failure the Republicans have been?  Could I hope that we will soon see a post renouncing every republican vote you&#039;ve ever cast, and a commitment to the Ted Kennedy wing of the democratic party.  Don&#039;t be nervous, being right isn&#039;t as difficult as you might think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t need to look any further than the 2004 election to realize that people are stupid.  Since Fox News is still in business, I know there have got to be people who still think that Saddam Huessien is responsible for 9/11.  </p>
<p>Great work Fox News fans and Bible belters, Bush has really defended marriage since his relection.  What is the next issue to protect America from, Flag Burning?  In the meantime, good luck finding any actual accomplishments (or even an agenda) that exsist in reality aka outside of Karl Rove&#8217;s bunghole.</p>
<p>Charlie Sheen is a moron; fantastic observation everythingswank!  Is your effort to find pseudo-news really just an effort to avoid writing about what a fucking failure the Republicans have been?  Could I hope that we will soon see a post renouncing every republican vote you&#8217;ve ever cast, and a commitment to the Ted Kennedy wing of the democratic party.  Don&#8217;t be nervous, being right isn&#8217;t as difficult as you might think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meade</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingswank.com/2006/03/charlie-sheen-is-an-fuxtard/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Meade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingswank.com/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dave&quot;--  Firstly, just because Dan Rather and Peter Jennings reporting from the scene said it looked like a controlled implosion does not make that a fact.  Those are opinions (given under the heat of the moment and mentioned solely because some people did not see the explosions on TV but actually heard the reports from radio and, as good reporters do, they described what the scene looked like and did not attempt to give an expert analysis).  I watched it on TV and I don&#039;t think it looked like a &quot;controlled implosion&quot; at all (which is my opinion)-- it may be worthwhile for you to watch those documentaries on the Discovery channel that show what demolition crews do and what a REAL &quot;controlled implosion&quot; looks like: it is a huge difference.  
     Secondly, of course it would look like a &quot;controlled implosion&quot; because the several hundred thousand tons of building materials will fall straight down (we call that &quot;Gravity&quot;) unless acted upon by a greater force from one or another side to cause it to fall outwards or sideways (we call that &quot;Physics&quot;).  Thus, the &quot;implosion&quot; was &quot;controlled&quot; by &quot;Gravity&quot; working with &quot;Physics&quot; to create the appearance of a &quot;controlled implosion.&quot; 
     Thirdly, we pay entertainers to entertain; NOT for thier opinions on anything.  Since Mr. Sheen has seen fit to grace the world with his opinions (not supported by any &quot;facts&quot; he can name, give, or cite) then I have, in turn, graced the world with my opinion that &quot;Charlie Sheen is a Fuxtard.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dave&#8221;&#8211;  Firstly, just because Dan Rather and Peter Jennings reporting from the scene said it looked like a controlled implosion does not make that a fact.  Those are opinions (given under the heat of the moment and mentioned solely because some people did not see the explosions on TV but actually heard the reports from radio and, as good reporters do, they described what the scene looked like and did not attempt to give an expert analysis).  I watched it on TV and I don&#8217;t think it looked like a &#8220;controlled implosion&#8221; at all (which is my opinion)&#8211; it may be worthwhile for you to watch those documentaries on the Discovery channel that show what demolition crews do and what a REAL &#8220;controlled implosion&#8221; looks like: it is a huge difference.<br />
     Secondly, of course it would look like a &#8220;controlled implosion&#8221; because the several hundred thousand tons of building materials will fall straight down (we call that &#8220;Gravity&#8221;) unless acted upon by a greater force from one or another side to cause it to fall outwards or sideways (we call that &#8220;Physics&#8221;).  Thus, the &#8220;implosion&#8221; was &#8220;controlled&#8221; by &#8220;Gravity&#8221; working with &#8220;Physics&#8221; to create the appearance of a &#8220;controlled implosion.&#8221;<br />
     Thirdly, we pay entertainers to entertain; NOT for thier opinions on anything.  Since Mr. Sheen has seen fit to grace the world with his opinions (not supported by any &#8220;facts&#8221; he can name, give, or cite) then I have, in turn, graced the world with my opinion that &#8220;Charlie Sheen is a Fuxtard.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingswank.com/2006/03/charlie-sheen-is-an-fuxtard/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingswank.com/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re the insane one. You crap on this guy for rasing valid questions? Why are you ignoring the FACT (that he brought up) that Dan Rather and Peter Jennings both said live while watching the buildings go down that it looked like a &quot;controlled implosion.&quot;  You&#039;re just afraid of the truth like the rest of the mindless sheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the insane one. You crap on this guy for rasing valid questions? Why are you ignoring the FACT (that he brought up) that Dan Rather and Peter Jennings both said live while watching the buildings go down that it looked like a &#8220;controlled implosion.&#8221;  You&#8217;re just afraid of the truth like the rest of the mindless sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.224 seconds -->
